Why I Switched from Using HPS to LED

By Harry H

Why I Switched from Using HPS to LED: Efficiency and Savings Explained

We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more

Growing plants indoors often requires the use of artificial lighting, and for many years, High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights were the go-to option for growers looking for efficient, powerful lighting solutions. However, over time, I began to notice the drawbacks of using HPS lights, such as high energy consumption and excessive heat output. That’s when I decided to explore alternative options like LED grow lights.

After researching about LED technology, I found compelling advantages that convinced me to make the switch from HPS to LED lighting in my growing environment. Among these benefits were reduced energy costs, minimized heat generation, and a longer lifespan for the grow lights. Additionally, the advancement of LED technology provided many spectral efficiencies that proved beneficial for my plants’ growth. Let’s dig more into why I switched from HPS to LED.

History of HPS Lighting

When I first started using grow lights, high-pressure sodium (HPS) lighting was the most popular choice among growers. HPS lights have been around for many years, initially developed for street and industrial lighting applications. They deliver a wide spectrum of light, suitable for growing plants, particularly in the flowering stage.

In the beginning, I appreciated my HPS lights for their efficiency and performance. However, I soon realized that they also came with several drawbacks. One significant issue was the heat produced by HPS lights, which required me to keep a check on temperature levels and invest in additional cooling systems. This resulted in a considerable increase in my energy bills.

Throughout the years, ongoing research and development in the field of lighting propelled the emergence of alternative options, with LED grow lights gaining prominence. The advancements in LED technology promised numerous benefits over HPS lighting, including energy savings, less heat output, and longer lifespans, which ultimately convinced me to make the switch to LED grow lights.

The transition from HPS to LED was not without its challenges, but overall, it proved to be a wise decision. I’ve experienced a significant reduction in energy consumption, as research has shown that converting from HPS to LED lighting can result in energy savings of 40-60%. Moreover, I no longer have to deal with excessive heat, which has helped me maintain a more stable and suitable growing environment for my plants.

Looking back on my experience with HPS lighting, I have seen the evolution of grow light technology and its impact on my growing operations. As a grower, keeping up with these advancements and embracing newer, more efficient lighting options like LED has been crucial for enhancing my cultivation processes and achieving better results.

Why I Considered Switching From HPS to LED

When I first began my indoor growing journey, I utilized High-Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights due to their popular reputation and budget-friendly nature. However, after researching and experiencing the benefits of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lights, I strongly considered making the switch.

One of the main reasons I contemplated transitioning to LED grow lights was the significant reduction in heat output. I found that HPS lights emitted around 80% of their energy as heat, whereas LEDs only released 15% to 25% energy as heat. Overheating had been a constant issue in my indoor grow space, and the cooler LED technology would help prevent this.

Secondly, I recognized that the energy consumption of LED lights was lower than that of HPS lights. Since energy efficiency is crucial for both my wallet and the environment, this was a significant factor in my decision-making process. LED lights also allowed me to save on costs associated with heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Another vital aspect that caught my attention was the potential for increased yield with LED grow lights. Although it is not guaranteed, it has been observed that LED lights can improve plant growth and ultimately lead to higher yields than traditional HPS systems. This was an essential factor as I aimed to maximize the productivity of my indoor grow space.

Lastly, the long-term financial benefits of LED lights also played a significant role in my decision. While the upfront cost of LED systems may be higher, their energy efficiency, reduced heat output, and overall improved performance made them seem like a more sustainable and budget-friendly option in the long run.

In conclusion, after thoroughly considering the benefits of LED grow lights, such as reduced heat output, lower energy consumption, the potential for increased yield, and long-term financial savings, I decided it was time to make the switch from HPS to LED lighting.

The Emergence of LED Technology

When I first started my indoor gardening journey, I used high-pressure sodium (HPS) lighting, as it was the industry standard for controlled environment agriculture (CEA) applications [source]. However, I soon realized that LED technology had emerged as a more efficient, reliable, and versatile lighting solution.

I was intrigued by the energy efficiency of LED lighting as it consumes significantly less power than HPS, leading to lower electricity bills. Moreover, LED lights generate less heat which reduces the necessity for cooling systems, further decreasing energy consumption and operational costs [source]. This was a major factor in my decision to switch from HPS to LED.

Another appealing aspect of LEDs is their longer lifespan. LED lights can last up to 50,000 hours, while HPS lights typically last around 12,000 to 24,000 hours [source]. This means that I need to replace my LED lights less frequently, reducing both my maintenance efforts and costs.

LED technology also provides excellent spectral control, enabling me to customize the light spectrum for optimal plant growth. In contrast, HPS lights emit a limited spectrum, which may not be ideal for all plant growth stages or species [source]. With my LED lighting system, I’m able to fine-tune the light spectrum depending on the specific needs of my plants.

To sum up, my decision to switch from HPS to LED was driven by the energy efficiency, extended lifespan, and improved spectral control that LED technology offers. This transition has not only benefited my plants but also led to cost savings and a more eco-friendly indoor garden.

Comparison of HPS and LED Grow Lights

When I first began growing plants indoors, I used high-pressure sodium (HPS) grow lights. At the time, these were considered the industry standard. However, after seeing more and more growers switch to LED lights, I decided to research the differences between HPS and LED grow lights. My findings ultimately led me to make the switch to LED lights, and I’d like to share the key differences that convinced me.

One of the main factors I considered was the intensity of the lights. HPS lights can emit an incredibly high intensity of light, but LEDs can match and sometimes even surpass that intensity. Furthermore, LEDs provide more control over the PAR (photosynthetically active radiation) range, which is essential for photosynthesis in plants. This allowed me to optimize the light spectrum for my plants better and ultimately led to healthier growth.

The next aspect was wattage and energy efficiency. HPS lights have a much higher wattage compared to LED lights. In fact, LED lights can save up to 50% energy compared to HPS lights, which has a significant impact on electricity bills. I also found that LED lights produce less heat, which reduces the need for extensive cooling systems in my grow space.

Another factor that influenced my decision is the PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density) value of each light type. LED lights produce a higher PPFD per wattage, meaning I could achieve better light penetration and coverage with fewer watts. This allowed me to optimize my grow space further and provide the right light distribution for different stages of plant growth.

Lastly, I compared LED grow lights to other alternatives, such as CFL (compact fluorescent light) grow lights. While CFL lights can be cheaper and more energy-efficient than HPS lights, they still fall short of LEDs in terms of light intensity and spectrum control. LEDs can provide a full spectrum, unlike CFLs, which produce a more limited spectrum range.

In summary, making the switch from HPS to LED grow lights improved the growth and health of my plants. This change also resulted in cost savings for electricity and the additional benefits of precise spectrum control, better intensity, and energy efficiency. As a first-person grower, I am confident sharing my experience can help others make an informed decision about their grow light choices.

Effect of LED and HPS on Plants

When I first started growing plants, I used High Pressure Sodium (HPS) lights. They were widely popular and seemed like the best choice for my needs. However, as I learned more about the effects of lighting on plant growth and development, I decided to make the switch to Light Emitting Diodes (LED) lights.

One of the main reasons I chose to switch to LED lights was their energy efficiency. I found out that implementing LED lights in a setup previously lit by an HPS system reduces lighting energy consumption by between 40-60%. This not only reduces the overall cost of running my grow operation, but it also helps minimize my environmental footprint.

Another aspect that convinced me to switch was the reduced heat output of LEDs. With HPS lights, around 80% of the energy emitted comes out as heat, whereas LED grow lights release only 15% to 25% of their energy as heat. This lower heat output made it much easier for me to maintain a stable and suitable temperature for my plants, ensuring their optimal growth and development.

LED lights also offer customizable light spectrums, which allowed me to tailor the lighting to match the specific needs of my plants during different growth stages. For example, I can use blue hues for sturdy growth and root development, and red hues for better flowering and higher yields 1. This fine-tuned control over the light spectrum enabled me to optimize plant growth and make the most of the available nutrients.

I noticed a significant improvement in my plants’ growth and flowering after making the switch to LED lights. The ability to control the light spectrum and the reduced heat output of LEDs created a more conducive environment for my plants, helping them better absorb nutrients and thrive throughout their developmental stages. This ultimately led to higher yields and better-quality flowers, making the transition from HPS to LED well worth it for me.

The Price and Setup of LED and HPS Systems

I found that the initial cost of LED grow lights often appears higher than that of HPS lighting systems. However, LEDs have a longer lifespan and lower energy consumption, resulting in long-term cost savings. LEDs can guarantee 50,000 hours of sustained light and, in practice, have been seen to surpass 100,000 hours. Importantly, their efficiency doesn’t drop considerably over time, which means I save on energy costs while maximizing the efficiency of my lights ^1^.

When it comes to the setup, I had to consider various components for each system. For HPS lights, I needed a bulb, reflector, and ballast. The ballast is essential, as it regulates the current flowing through the lamp, preventing it from overheating. On the other hand, LED lighting systems need a diode chip, driver, and sometimes a heatsink. The driver in LED systems is similar to a ballast in HPS systems as it maintains the correct current.

Related: DIY $35 LED Grow Light

One drawback I noticed with HPS bulbs is that they lose their efficiency over time and require replacements more frequently than LED lights. So, not only did I have to regularly purchase new HPS bulbs, but I needed to replace the ballasts as well, since their lifespan is typically similar to that of the bulbs^2^. This added to the overall cost and maintenance of my HPS setup.

In terms of energy savings, implementing LED lights in my operation, which was previously lit by HPS, reduced my lighting energy consumption between 40-60%^3^. This fact played a significant role in my decision to switch from HPS to LED.

Overall, while the upfront cost of LED systems may intimidate some, the long-term benefits in energy savings, reduced maintenance, and improved efficiency convinced my decision to make the switch to LED, despite the initial investment.

Impact on Growing Environment and Costs

When I decided to switch from HPS to LED, I noticed several significant improvements in my grow room’s environment and overall costs. First, I experienced a noticeable reduction in heat output. Where HPS lights release approximately 80% of their energy as heat, LEDs typically emit only 15-25% of their energy as heat. As a result, my grow room’s temperature became much easier to manage.

This improved temperature control led to more stable humidity levels. With HPS lights, I constantly struggled to maintain the ideal humidity for my plants. However, the lower heat output of LED lights allowed me to achieve and maintain a consistent humidity level more easily.

Another major benefit I found when switching to LED lights was the reduction in energy consumption. Studies have shown that implementing LEDs in a grow operation previously lit by HPS systems can reduce lighting energy consumption by 40-60%. This decrease in energy usage not only contributed to lower utility bills but also helped reduce my grow room’s environmental impact.

LED technology also provided me with improved control over the spectrum of light my plants received. Thanks to the LED chips, I was able to fine-tune the light wavelengths for optimal plant growth during each stage of the growth cycle.

Furthermore, the heat sinks in LED lighting fixtures allowed for more efficient heat dissipation, which proved to be a game-changer for my growing environment. By switching from HPS to LED, I eliminated the need for supplementary cooling systems, such as high-powered fans or air conditioners, significantly reducing my energy consumption even further.

In conclusion, my decision to switch from HPS to LED lighting led to significant improvements in my grow room’s environment, including better temperature and humidity control, as well as cost-effective energy usage. With these changes, I felt confident and knowledgeable in managing my growing space more efficiently and sustainably.

LED’s Influence on Yield and Revenue

When I first started growing cannabis, I used high-pressure sodium (HPS) lights, which were quite popular among growers. However, over time, I decided to switch to LED grow lights due to several reasons that positively impacted my yield and revenue.

The most noticeable change I observed after switching to LEDs was the increased yields in the flowering stage of my cannabis plants. LEDs offered a more well-rounded spectrum of light, which promoted better bud structure and resin production. I also noticed an improvement in overall plant health and growth, as mentioned in a Reddit post, which contributed to higher yields.

One of the primary concerns for me was the cost associated with running my grow operation. With LED grow lights, I experienced significant energy savings in the long run. This eventually led to a higher return on investment, even though the initial cost of acquiring LEDs was higher than HPS lights. The reduced electricity costs became a crucial factor in my decision to switch.

Moreover, LED lights generate considerably less heat than HPS lights. This reduction in temperature not only provided a more optimal environment for my cannabis plants but also lowered the need for additional cooling systems, thereby decreasing maintenance costs.

Lastly, I found out that many utility companies offer rebates for switching to energy-efficient LED lights. Such incentives further added to the financial benefits of making the switch.

Switching from HPS to LED grow lights positively impacted my yield, the potency of my cannabis plants, and my overall revenue while helping me save on electricity and maintenance costs. I am confident that my decision to switch was a wise and well-informed one.

Commercial Adoption of LED Lighting

As a commercial grower involved in controlled environment agriculture, I have experienced firsthand the benefits of switching from high-pressure sodium (HPS) lights to LED lighting in my grow rooms. Not only have they improved the overall efficiency of my operation, but they have also helped me achieve better results with my plants’ growth and wellbeing.

One of the primary reasons I made the transition to LED lighting was the significant energy savings it offers. In fact, it is estimated that only 15-25% of LED energy is emitted as heat, whereas HPS and CFL lights lose about 80% of their energy as heat. This means that my indoor grow operation runs much cooler and more energy-efficient, allowing me to save money on both electricity and cooling costs.

Additionally, LED lights have a much longer lifespan than HPS bulbs, reducing both my maintenance costs and frequency of bulb replacements. This has been particularly beneficial in my large-scale commercial grow operation, as any downtime or delays in replacements can significantly impact my productivity.

I’ve also noticed improvements in the quality of my plants since using LED grow lights. Since LEDs emit a spectrum of light that is more tailored to plants’ needs, my plants appear healthier and more vigorous. I’ve been able to achieve better results during the vegging stage, which has translated into higher yields and better quality produce.

Moreover, LED technology is incredibly versatile, allowing me to customize the light spectrum to suit specific needs of my plants at different growth stages. I have even experimented with various light recipes to find the perfect blend that optimizes growth and productivity.

Finally, as an environmentally conscious grower, I’m pleased to be using a lighting solution that has a lower environmental impact than traditional HPS lights. With the advancements in LED technology, it is evident that this is a more sustainable option for the future of commercial growing.

Overall, my experience with Gavita LED lights in my indoor grow rooms has been nothing but positive. The energy savings, reduced maintenance costs, improved plant health, and customization options have all contributed to the success of my commercial growing operation. For any grower considering making the switch, I can confidently say that the benefits of LED lighting are well worth the investment.

Implications for the Future of Indoor Growing

When I switched from high-pressure sodium (HPS) fixtures to LED grow lights in my indoor growing setup, I observed considerable changes that made me confident in the future of indoor growing. The first thing I noticed was the significant reduction in radiant heat emitted by the LED lights compared to HPS fixtures. This helped me save both energy and money since my air conditioning system no longer needed to work as hard to maintain optimal temperatures.

As a horticulturalist, I found LED grow lights to be more versatile due to their spectrum flexibility. They offer the optimal balance of red and blue light, which promotes healthy growth throughout the entire lifecycle of my plants. Additionally, the adjustable spectrum allowed me to take advantage of the increased photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) that LED lights deliver. This, combined with a more efficient delivery of photons, improved my plants’ growth cycle and overall yield.

LED lights have also led to a decline in crop failure incidents for me. With HPS fixtures, I used to experience crop failures due to issues related to heat and light intensity. Swapping to LED lights allowed me to maintain consistent environmental conditions that promote plant health, reduce stress, and protect my crops from aforementioned problems.

Another aspect I appreciated about LED lights is their lifetime. LED grow lights are known to last significantly longer than HPS fixtures, making them a more cost-effective choice for long-term indoor growers like myself. This also contributes to a decrease in overall operational costs and reduces the need for frequent replacements.

I also found that using LED grow lights positively impacts the cannabinoid profile of my plants, specifically THC content. Using LED lights enhanced the THC production in my plants, which I believe is due to the precise light spectrum that these lights offer.

In conclusion, my experience transitioning from HPS to LED grow lights has made me confident in the future of indoor growing. The use of LED lights brings a multitude of benefits that can revolutionize and improve the indoor growing industry, making it more efficient, environmentally friendly, and sustainable for years to come.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between HPS and LED?

When I switched from HPS to LED, I noticed significant differences between the two lighting systems. HPS lights produce more heat, which can lead to increased room temperatures and the need for additional cooling systems. On the other hand, LED lights generate less heat, making temperature management easier in the grow area. Additionally, LED lights typically have a longer lifespan and can provide a more targeted light spectrum for plant growth.

What are the benefits of using LED over HPS?

By switching to LED, I've experienced several benefits, including energy savings, reduced heat generation, and improved spectral efficiency. LED lights are more energy-efficient, which not only helps reduce electricity costs but also contributes to a lower carbon footprint. The reduced heat output of LED lights also means that I don't have to invest as much in cooling equipment, leading to further cost savings.

How do yields compare between HPS and LED?

In my experience, switching from HPS to LED has not negatively impacted yields. While some growers report reduced yields when first transitioning to LED, this can usually be attributed to a learning curve for adjusting growing conditions to optimize plant growth under LED lighting. In fact, the improved spectrum and energy efficiency of LED lights can lead to higher-quality crops.

What are the energy savings when switching from HPS to LED?

One of the main reasons I switched to LED was for the energy savings. Studies have shown that implementing LED lights in operations previously using HPS systems can reduce lighting energy consumption by between 40-60%. Depending on the size of the grow operation, these savings can equate to significant cost reductions over time.

How does LED light quality affect plant growth compared to HPS?

The targeted light spectrum provided by LED grow lights can significantly enhance plant growth compared to HPS lights. I find that the customizable spectrum allows me to tailor the lighting to suit my plants’ specific needs, resulting in improved growth and overall crop quality.

Are there any drawbacks to using LED instead of HPS?

Switching to LED lighting does come with some initial drawbacks. One of the challenges when first making the switch from HPS to LED is getting accustomed to the new lighting conditions and adjusting grow room environmental factors. LED lights can be more expensive upfront compared to HPS, but the long-term energy savings and improved crop quality generally make the investment worthwhile.